Deck | Creator | Record | Best Finish |
---|---|---|---|
Bant Toxic | platinum-mythic rank player | 6-0 | 1st in Traditional Standard Ranked Decklists: April 28, 2025 |
Abzan Pixie , Bant Mill , Bant Toxic , Domain Zur Overlords , Golgari Reanimator , Selesnya Beanstalk , Selesnya Cage , Selesnya Gearhulk , Selesnya Midrange
Branchloft Pathway ranks #4193 out of approximately 4236 cards in raw efficiency (top 99%).
Colorless average: 47.0%
Performance compared to other Colorless cardsBased on our comprehensive multi-metric analysis, Branchloft Pathway is an underperforming card in the current meta.
Recommended number of copies: 1
Performance Efficiency: 9.36 (Win rate × Top 8 rate ÷ Mana value)
At 0 mana, the average win rate in the format is 46.7%. Branchloft Pathway has a win rate of 53.0%, making it 13.6% better than other 0-mana cards.
Card Name | Type | Deck Count | Win Rate | 1st Places |
---|---|---|---|---|
Damping Sphere | Artifact | 5 | 59.5% | 0 |
Arcane Signet | Artifact | 5 | 59.2% | 2 |
Thoughtseize | Sorcery | 5 | 57.6% | 0 |
Charming Prince | Creature — Human Noble | 7 | 51.0% | 2 |
Extraction Specialist | Creature — Human Rogue | 5 | 48.0% | 1 |
Tamiyo's Safekeeping | Instant | 6 | 47.1% | 0 |
Kambal, Consul of Allocation | Legendary Creature — Human Advisor | 5 | 46.7% | 1 |
Esper Sentinel | Artifact Creature — Human Soldier | 5 | 46.2% | 1 |
Fatal Push | Instant | 7 | 43.5% | 0 |
Portable Hole | Artifact | 11 | 43.5% | 1 |
Cards that perform better with Branchloft Pathway than they do on average. A positive synergy score indicates stronger performance together.
Card Name | Type | Mana | Decks | Win Rate Together | Win Rate Apart | Synergy Score |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Damping Sphere | Artifact | 2 | 5 | 59.1% | 53.7% | +5.4% |
Shapers' Sanctuary | Enchantment | 1 | 6 | 52.2% | 50.9% | +1.3% |
Archon of Emeria | Creature — Archon | 3 | 5 | 51.9% | 52.4% | -0.6% |
Fatal Push | Instant | 1 | 5 | 52.6% | 54.0% | -1.4% |
Collected Company | Instant | 4 | 9 | 48.6% | 52.5% | -3.9% |
Bishop of Wings | Creature — Human Cleric | 2 | 5 | 50.0% | 54.5% | -4.5% |
Giada, Font of Hope | Legendary Creature — Angel | 2 | 5 | 50.0% | 55.4% | -5.4% |
Inspiring Overseer | Creature — Angel Cleric | 3 | 5 | 50.0% | 55.7% | -5.7% |
Righteous Valkyrie | Creature — Angel Cleric | 3 | 5 | 50.0% | 55.8% | -5.8% |
Reidane, God of the Worthy | Legendary Creature — God | 3 | 5 | 45.8% | 53.4% | -7.6% |
Archetype | Deck Count | % of Archetype | Win Rate |
---|---|---|---|
Selesnya Cage | 11 | 3.8% | 37.2% |
Domain Zur Overlords | 8 | 0.5% | 46.7% |
Abzan Pixie | 7 | 17.9% | 41.2% |
Selesnya Gearhulk | 4 | 33.3% | 36.2% |
Selesnya Mounts | 3 | 42.9% | 16.7% |
Statistic | Description | Formula |
---|---|---|
Win Rate Impact | How much this card increases or decreases the win rate of decks that include it, compared to the average deck in the format. | (Win rate of decks with this card) - (Average win rate of all decks) |
Top Table Win Rate | A weighted win rate that gives more significance to performance in higher tournament placements. First place finishes count for 2x, with diminishing weight down to 8th place. | ∑(wins × placement_weight) / ∑((wins + losses) × placement_weight) |
Meta Trend | Shows if the card is performing better or worse in the most recent period compared to earlier periods. Positive values indicate improving performance. | (Win rate in recent half of time period) - (Win rate in earlier half of time period) |
Confidence Factor | A measure of statistical reliability based on sample size. The progress bar indicates how confident we are in the statistics (with larger sample sizes providing higher confidence). | log10(Number of decks + 1) |
Average Copies | The average number of copies of this card included in decks that use it. | ∑(Copies in each deck) / (Number of decks) |
Card Synergy Score | Measures how well this card performs with other cards compared to their individual performance. | (Win rate together) - (Average of individual win rates) |
Raw Efficiency | Win rate points per mana invested. Higher values indicate better returns on mana investment. | (Win rate) / (Mana value) |
Relative Efficiency | How efficient this card is compared to the average card of the same mana value. | ((Win rate) / (Format average win rate for same mana)) / (Mana value) |
Performance Efficiency | Combined metric that accounts for win rate, tournament success, and mana investment. | (Win rate × Top 8 placement rate) / (Mana value) |
Game Impact Factor | A measure of how much this card affects game outcomes, based on win rate adjusted by its deviation from the format average. | Win rate × (1 + (Win rate - Format average) / 100) |
Color Differential | How this card's win rate compares to the average win rate of other cards of the same color. | Win rate - Average win rate for same color |
All statistics are calculated using tournament data from the selected time period. Sample sizes below 10 decks may not provide statistically significant results.